Posted
Monday, March 7, 2005 @ 1927 PST
----- permalink
-----
|
Mysteries and excesses.
The power and mystery
of open water never ceases to entrance me. This evening I was
taking a walk on the perimeter path around the west and north
side of Treasure Island. The sun was low and golden in the west,
with clouds hovering low over the Presidio and spilling between
peaks in the Marin Highlands. The water was choppy and green with
a low swell, and the flood tide just beginning. Only a couple
of sailboats remained on the Bay, and the ferries were dashing
back and forth with the evening commuters. One of the big Coast
Guard cutters that are stationed at Coast Guard Island in the
estuary between Oakland and Alameda was swinging around Alcatraz.
By the time I got an all the way down to Northpoint and then back
to Westpoint, she was under the Golden Gate and heading out for
the open ocean. There is something terribly evocative about a
ship putting to sea. It raises images of leaving the known shore
behind you, of exploration and facing the unknown in a realm that
is far, far larger than yourself. It would seem that we could
not possibly impact something so vast and so overpowering. Unfortunately,
that is not the case. I spotted a bit of plastic floating on the
water, and was reminded of a segment of NPR’s
Science Friday that I heard last week. They were interviewing
biologists who do deep-sea exploration looking for new species.
One of them said that one of the most surprising finds that she
had made was the variety of human garbage that has been swept
far out to sea and has sunk down to what were once pristine depths.
It is times like these that I am ashamed of the willful ignorance
and excesses of our civilization.
Speaking of excesses,
at the post office the talk was all about the
“friendly fire” incident involving the Italian journalist.
The people in line who were discussing it seemed to have the details
somewhat wrong: they believe that the journalist had been killed
(it was actually an Italian government agent), and they seemed
completely unaware that despite the opinion of the Italian people,
their government has supported the invasion and occupation of
Iraq and still has troops stationed there. What does seem to upset
the people involved in the discussion was the notion that there
are people in the world who believe that the action at the checkpoint
was deliberate. “How could anyone think such a thing of
us?” exclaimed one woman. Unfortunately, there is precedence
that would lead some people to suspect such a thing of the US,
although I think that it is an unreasonable charge in this particular
case. However, it is also unreasonable to have secret and unquestioned
rules of engagement for checkpoints that interface with the civilian
population that the military is supposed to be there to “protect”.
What strikes me as excessive here is the amount of firepower brought
to bear in circumstances where it would seem most of the time
they are dealing with civilians, not insurgents. If not for this
high profile incident, I think the majority of people would be
unaware of the fact that civilians routinely get shot and killed
by troops who are ostensibly protecting themselves. No one is
held liable for these incidents, although some families do receive
a paltry sum of money for their loss at the discretion of the
local commander. The upsetting part is the apparent lack of value
placed on other people’s lives. Are Westerner’s lives
really worth that much more than anyone else’s? Would anyone
have reported this incident at the checkpoint if it had been a
family of Iraqis instead of Europeans? I’m uncomfortable
with the probable answers to these questions, just like I’m
uncomfortable with the notion that the military’s undisclosed
philosophy is that it is better to accidentally kill civilians
(who do not count for much and are not counted when they are killed)
then to risk American lives. That strikes me as a value judgment
that flies in the face of the concept of liberty and justice for
all.
|